PowerMatchLabCompare · Calculate · Choose smarter

Anker SOLIX F2000 (PowerHouse 767) vs F3000 vs F3800

The F2000, F3000 and F3800 are Anker's SOLIX F-series stations, positioned for home backup rather than portable use. This comparison is for buyers who have already chosen the F-series and need to decide how much capacity and continuous output actually matches their circuits, rather than which brand to trust.

These picks are focused on the U.S. market. Before buying, confirm plug type, voltage (120V), warranty terms, and regional availability on the Amazon listing.

Last checked September 1, 2026 — see each product’s Specifications tab for full provenance.

Quick summary

  • Anker SOLIX F3800 leads on capacity (wh) (3,840 Wh vs 2,048 Wh, 3,072 Wh).
  • Anker SOLIX F3800 leads on rated continuous output (6,000 W vs 2,400 W, 3,600 W).
  • Anker SOLIX F3800 leads on surge / peak output (9,000 W vs Not verified, 7,200 W).

A use case below only names a model as ahead when at least two independent, comparable fields agree (or the use case is defined by a single field, like solar charging). A single distinguishing field in an otherwise-tied or unverified category is named specifically, not counted as winning that use case.

Independent editorial illustration of the Anker SOLIX F2000 (PowerHouse 767) — not an official manufacturer photograph.

Independent editorial illustration — not an official product photo.

Anker SOLIX

F2000 (PowerHouse 767)

52Fair
View full product page →
Original illustrative render representing a whole-home backup portable power station — not an exact photograph of the Anker SOLIX F3000.

Illustrative image — not an exact product photograph.

Anker SOLIX

F3000

62Good
View full product page →
Original illustrative render representing a whole-home backup portable power station — not an exact photograph of the Anker SOLIX F3800.

Illustrative image — not an exact product photograph.

Anker SOLIX

F3800

69Good
View full product page →

Spec comparison

Reused directly from the same catalog and winner-highlighting logic as the general Compare page. A blank or “Not verified” cell means the data isn’t on file — it is never treated as zero, and a difference is only highlighted when both values are actually known.

Specification comparison between Anker SOLIX F2000 (PowerHouse 767), Anker SOLIX F3000, Anker SOLIX F3800
SpecificationAnker SOLIX F2000 (PowerHouse 767)Anker SOLIX F3000Anker SOLIX F3800
Energy & output
Capacity (Wh)2,048 Wh3,072 Wh3,840 Wh
Rated continuous output2,400 W3,600 W6,000 W
Surge / peak outputNot verified7,200 W9,000 W
Max expanded capacity4,096 WhNot verified53,800 Wh
Portability
WeightNot verified41.5 kg60 kg
Energy per kg (Wh/kg)Not verified74 Wh/kg64 Wh/kg
DimensionsNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verified
Idle consumptionNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verified
Charging
Solar input (max)1,000 WNot verified2,400 W
AC charging (max)Not verifiedNot verifiedNot verified
Charging time (stated)Not verifiedNot verifiedUnder 2 hours via maximum solar input under optimal conditions
Ports
AC outlets4 outletsNot verified8 outlets
USB-C ports3 portsNot verifiedNot verified
USB-A ports2 portsNot verifiedNot verified
RV TT-30 outletYesNot verifiedYes
Native 120/240VNot verifiedNot verifiedYes
Backup
UPS switchoverNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verified
ExpandableYesNot verifiedYes
Battery
Battery chemistryLiFePO4LiFePO4LiFePO4
Cycle life (stated)Not verifiedNot verified3000+ cycles
Warranty (stated)5 yearsNot verified5 years
PowerMatch Score
Editorial score52/100 (Fair) · 3/5 dimensions62/100 (Good) · 3/5 dimensions69/100 (Good) · 4/5 dimensions

Scores are editorial calculations normalized against the whole PowerMatchLab catalog — not a lab test result. See the methodology.

Winner by use case

Each verdict below is derived only from the specific fields listed as criteria — never from overall impressions, and never from physical testing. A null field is neither a win nor a loss for either unit, and a category needs at least two independent fields to agree before it declares an overall winner (a category built around a single criterion, like solar charging, is the exception).

Refrigerator backup

No clear overall winner based on the data on file.

Anker SOLIX F3800 has the higher capacity (wh) among the data available, but surge / peak output and idle consumption and solar input (max) are not verified for one or more of these units.

Criteria: Capacity (Wh), Surge / peak output, Idle consumption, Solar input (max) (1 of 4 comparable).

RV / van life

No clear overall winner based on the data on file.

Anker SOLIX F3800 has the higher rated continuous output among the data available, but surge / peak output and rv tt-30 outlet and expandable are not verified for one or more of these units.

Criteria: Rated continuous output, Surge / peak output, RV TT-30 outlet, Expandable (1 of 4 comparable).

Camping

No clear overall winner based on the data on file.

Criteria: Weight, Energy per kg (Wh/kg), Idle consumption, Solar input (max) (0 of 4 comparable).

Home outage essentials

Anker SOLIX F3800 edges ahead here.

Criteria: Capacity (Wh), Rated continuous output, Native 120/240V, UPS switchover, Expandable (2 of 5 comparable).

Solar charging

No clear overall winner based on the data on file.

Criteria: Solar input (max) (0 of 1 comparable).

Portability

No clear overall winner based on the data on file.

Criteria: Weight, Energy per kg (Wh/kg) (0 of 2 comparable).

Estimated autonomy

Calculated the same way as each product page’s runtime table: capacity_wh × 0.85 ÷ device_watts. These are planning estimates, not lab measurements or guarantees.

Estimated runtime for example loads
Example loadAnker SOLIX F2000 (PowerHouse 767)Anker SOLIX F3000Anker SOLIX F3800
Refrigerator (full size) (~150 W)11.6 h17.4 h21.8 h
CPAP machine (no humidifier) (~40 W)43.5 h65.3 h81.6 h
LED lights (a few rooms) (~40 W)43.5 h65.3 h81.6 h
Why your real result may differ

These figures are planning estimates from the inputs and assumptions above — not a lab measurement. Your real result can vary with:

  • Temperature — cold reduces usable battery capacity; heat can trigger throttling
  • Battery age and condition — capacity fades gradually with cycles and time
  • Inverter efficiency — some energy is always lost converting DC to AC
  • Variable appliance draw — most appliances don't pull a constant wattage
  • Startup/surge power — a motor's brief startup spike can exceed its running watts
  • Appliance settings — e.g. humidifier, fan speed, or temperature setting
  • Conversion losses beyond the modeled efficiency assumption
  • Real solar conditions — actual panel output is usually well below its rated watts
  • The safety reserve is a margin for error, not a guarantee

Pros & limitations

From each product’s existing catalog entry — no personal impressions, noise, build-quality or real-world behavior is added here.

Anker SOLIX F2000 (PowerHouse 767)

Pros

  • LiFePO4 battery with InfiniPower technology, 10-year design lifespan per manufacturer
  • 2400W continuous output across 4 AC outlets plus a dedicated RV port
  • 5-year full-device warranty
  • Expandable to 4096Wh with one 760 expansion battery

Limitations

  • Surge/peak output figure and cycle-life count not independently verified
  • Sold under two names by the manufacturer (Anker SOLIX F2000 and the earlier PowerHouse 767) for the same physical unit — both names preserved here

Anker SOLIX F3000

Pros

  • 3600W continuous / 7200W surge
  • LiFePO4 battery (InfiniPower cell, 4000-cycle rated per manufacturer)

Limitations

  • Very heavy (41.5 kg)

Anker SOLIX F3800

Pros

  • 6000W continuous output
  • Native 120V/240V
  • Massive expansion potential
  • 2400W solar input
  • RV and home integration

Limitations

  • Very heavy
  • Far less portable than conventional power stations
  • Excessive for small loads

Conclusion

Anker SOLIX F3000 has the higher weight on file. Anker SOLIX F3800 has the higher capacity (wh) and rated continuous output and surge / peak output and solar input (max) on file.

Weight, Dimensions are not verified for the Anker SOLIX F2000 (PowerHouse 767). Dimensions, Expandable, Warranty (stated) are not verified for the Anker SOLIX F3000. Dimensions is not verified for the Anker SOLIX F3800. With those gaps, there is no absolute winner between these units based on the data currently on file.

If home outage essentials matters most to you, the Anker SOLIX F3800 has the edge on file for home outage essentials. For the other use cases evaluated above, the data on file doesn’t support picking one unit over the other — check which specific criteria matter for your situation.

None of these units have been physically tested by PowerMatchLab. Before buying, enter your own devices in the Power Calculator — the numbers above use example loads, and your real appliances may draw differently.

Anker SOLIX F2000 (PowerHouse 767)

Specs last checked September 12, 2026

Check Price on Amazon

Price, availability and current rating are shown on Amazon — PowerMatchLab does not display them because we have not independently verified them. As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases. Disclosure.

Full product page →

Anker SOLIX F3000

Specs last checked September 4, 2026

Check Price on Amazon

Price, availability and current rating are shown on Amazon — PowerMatchLab does not display them because we have not independently verified them. As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases. Disclosure.

Full product page →

Anker SOLIX F3800

Specs last checked September 1, 2026

Check Price on Amazon

Price, availability and current rating are shown on Amazon — PowerMatchLab does not display them because we have not independently verified them. As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases. Disclosure.

Full product page →
Specifications are recorded from manufacturer-published information; unverified fields are shown as “Not verified”, never guessed. Scores, winner highlights and runtime figures are PowerMatchLab calculations, not tests. As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases — a commission never determines ranking. See the methodology and affiliate disclosure.