Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 vs F2000 (PowerHouse 767)
The C2000 Gen 2 and F2000 both carry the Anker SOLIX name but target different jobs — the C2000 Gen 2 leans portable, the F2000 leans stationary home backup. This page compares the verified specs for buyers deciding which of Anker's own lines actually fits their situation.
These picks are focused on the U.S. market. Before buying, confirm plug type, voltage (120V), warranty terms, and regional availability on the Amazon listing.
Last checked September 1, 2026 — see each product’s Specifications tab for full provenance.
Quick summary
On the headline specs we compare, the data on file doesn’t show a decisive difference between these two units.
A use case below only names a model as ahead when at least two independent, comparable fields agree (or the use case is defined by a single field, like solar charging). A single distinguishing field in an otherwise-tied or unverified category is named specifically, not counted as winning that use case.

Illustrative image — not an exact product photograph.
Anker SOLIX
C2000 Gen 2

Independent editorial illustration — not an official product photo.
Anker SOLIX
F2000 (PowerHouse 767)
Spec comparison
Reused directly from the same catalog and winner-highlighting logic as the general Compare page. A blank or “Not verified” cell means the data isn’t on file — it is never treated as zero, and a difference is only highlighted when both values are actually known.
| Specification | Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 | Anker SOLIX F2000 (PowerHouse 767) |
|---|---|---|
| Energy & output | ||
| Capacity (Wh) | 2,048 Wh | 2,048 Wh |
| Rated continuous output | 2,400 W | 2,400 W |
| Surge / peak output | 4,000 W | Not verified |
| Max expanded capacity | 4,096 Wh | 4,096 Wh |
| Portability | ||
| Weight | 18.9 kg | Not verified |
| Energy per kg (Wh/kg) | 108 Wh/kg | Not verified |
| Dimensions | 459 × 250 × 257 mm | Not verified |
| Idle consumption | 9 W | Not verified |
| Charging | ||
| Solar input (max) | Not verified | 1,000 W |
| AC charging (max) | Not verified | Not verified |
| Charging time (stated) | 80% in 45 min; 100% in 58 min with supported charging configuration | Not verified |
| Ports | ||
| AC outlets | Not verified | 4 outlets |
| USB-C ports | Not verified | 3 ports |
| USB-A ports | 1 port | 2 ports |
| RV TT-30 outlet | Yes | Yes |
| Native 120/240V | No | Not verified |
| Backup | ||
| UPS switchover | 10 ms | Not verified |
| Expandable | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery chemistry | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Cycle life (stated) | 4000 cycles to 80% capacity | Not verified |
| Warranty (stated) | 5 years | 5 years |
| PowerMatch Score | ||
| Editorial score | 61/100 (Good) · 4/5 dimensions | 52/100 (Fair) · 3/5 dimensions |
Scores are editorial calculations normalized against the whole PowerMatchLab catalog — not a lab test result. See the methodology.
Winner by use case
Each verdict below is derived only from the specific fields listed as criteria — never from overall impressions, and never from physical testing. A null field is neither a win nor a loss for either unit, and a category needs at least two independent fields to agree before it declares an overall winner (a category built around a single criterion, like solar charging, is the exception).
Refrigerator backup
No clear overall winner based on the data on file.
Criteria: Capacity (Wh), Surge / peak output, Idle consumption, Solar input (max) (1 of 4 comparable).
RV / van life
No clear overall winner based on the data on file.
Criteria: Rated continuous output, Surge / peak output, RV TT-30 outlet, Expandable (3 of 4 comparable).
Camping
No clear overall winner based on the data on file.
Criteria: Weight, Energy per kg (Wh/kg), Idle consumption, Solar input (max) (0 of 4 comparable).
Home outage essentials
No clear overall winner based on the data on file.
Criteria: Capacity (Wh), Rated continuous output, Native 120/240V, UPS switchover, Expandable (3 of 5 comparable).
Solar charging
No clear overall winner based on the data on file.
Criteria: Solar input (max) (0 of 1 comparable).
Portability
No clear overall winner based on the data on file.
Criteria: Weight, Energy per kg (Wh/kg) (0 of 2 comparable).
Estimated autonomy
Calculated the same way as each product page’s runtime table: capacity_wh × 0.85 ÷ device_watts. These are planning estimates, not lab measurements or guarantees.
| Example load | Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 | Anker SOLIX F2000 (PowerHouse 767) |
|---|---|---|
| Refrigerator (full size) (~150 W) | 11.6 h | 11.6 h |
| CPAP machine (no humidifier) (~40 W) | 43.5 h | 43.5 h |
| LED lights (a few rooms) (~40 W) | 43.5 h | 43.5 h |
Why your real result may differ
These figures are planning estimates from the inputs and assumptions above — not a lab measurement. Your real result can vary with:
- Temperature — cold reduces usable battery capacity; heat can trigger throttling
- Battery age and condition — capacity fades gradually with cycles and time
- Inverter efficiency — some energy is always lost converting DC to AC
- Variable appliance draw — most appliances don't pull a constant wattage
- Startup/surge power — a motor's brief startup spike can exceed its running watts
- Appliance settings — e.g. humidifier, fan speed, or temperature setting
- Conversion losses beyond the modeled efficiency assumption
- Real solar conditions — actual panel output is usually well below its rated watts
- The safety reserve is a margin for error, not a guarantee
Pros & limitations
From each product’s existing catalog entry — no personal impressions, noise, build-quality or real-world behavior is added here.
Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2
Pros
- 2400W continuous output
- 4000W peak
- Expandable to 4096Wh
- Low 9W idle consumption
- TT-30 support
Limitations
- No native 240V
- Larger than 1kWh-class stations
Anker SOLIX F2000 (PowerHouse 767)
Pros
- LiFePO4 battery with InfiniPower technology, 10-year design lifespan per manufacturer
- 2400W continuous output across 4 AC outlets plus a dedicated RV port
- 5-year full-device warranty
- Expandable to 4096Wh with one 760 expansion battery
Limitations
- Surge/peak output figure and cycle-life count not independently verified
- Sold under two names by the manufacturer (Anker SOLIX F2000 and the earlier PowerHouse 767) for the same physical unit — both names preserved here
Conclusion
Both units share the same registered capacity (2,048 Wh).
Weight, Dimensions are not verified for the Anker SOLIX F2000 (PowerHouse 767). With those gaps, there is no absolute winner between these units based on the data currently on file.
None of the use cases evaluated above resolve to a decisive winner from the data on file — the right pick depends entirely on which specific criteria matter for your situation.
None of these units have been physically tested by PowerMatchLab. Before buying, enter your own devices in the Power Calculator — the numbers above use example loads, and your real appliances may draw differently.
Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2
Specs last checked September 1, 2026
Price, availability and current rating are shown on Amazon — PowerMatchLab does not display them because we have not independently verified them. As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases. Disclosure.
Anker SOLIX F2000 (PowerHouse 767)
Specs last checked September 12, 2026
Price, availability and current rating are shown on Amazon — PowerMatchLab does not display them because we have not independently verified them. As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases. Disclosure.